Updated: May 1, 2009, 1:17 PM ET
AP Photo/Elise AmendolaKevin Garnett has been a spectator throughout the series. Will that change in Game 7?
Seven OTs so far. Game 7 looming. Controversy and clutch shooting. Lead changes: 106. Players climbing new career peaks. Too many moments to count.
When at a loss for words, we turn to our experts for their wisdom.
Seven questions on Bulls-Celtics, one of the greatest seven-game series ever:
1. Best NBA postseason series ever, best first-round series ever, or neither?
J.A. Adande, ESPN.com: Could be the best first-round series, but can’t call the election until all precincts report. If Game 7 is a blowout or a dud, you can’t make this series an all-time best.
And I’m big on stakes, so to be the best postseason series, it’s got to be either the NBA Finals or the de facto Finals. Neither of these teams will win the championship, so ultimately, this series will be only a sidebar to the 2009 playoff story. It sure is great to watch, though.
Chris Broussard, ESPN The Magazine: The only reason this might not be the greatest playoff series in NBA history is it’s a first-round series. It’s hard to call a first-round series the best.
But for sheer drama, for individual performances, for competitiveness, this is the greatest postseason series of all time.
Ric Bucher, ESPN The Magazine: Best NBA postseason series ever — no, but maybe I’d feel different if I had attended the game. For me, best still goes to Warriors over the Mavericks in 2007 — because it was historic (first eighth seed to beat a No. 1 seed in a seven-game series), wholly unexpected and I attended every game.
The Celtics were expected to be vulnerable with Kevin Garnett injured; conversely, it was the underdog Warriors, with Baron Davis limping along, that overcame injury to pull off the upset.
Chad Ford, ESPN.com: I can’t think of another playoff series I’ve enjoyed as much as Bulls-Celtics. I loved the underdog Warriors toppling the Dallas Mavericks in 2007. But I’ve never seen two teams so evenly matched that they can match each other point for point.
John Hollinger, ESPN.com: In terms of drama, this is the best postseason series, but that’s not the only criterion. There’s not enough at stake to put it past the likes of Lakers-Celtics in ’84 or Mavs-Spurs in ’06, just to name a couple of prominent examples.
As far as first-round series go, however, this is clearly the best. Five buzzer finishes in six games? A total of seven overtime periods? Seriously?
Chris Sheridan, ESPN.com: I’ve witnessed so many classics in the early rounds — the Charles Smith Bulls-Knicks game at Madison Square Garden in ’93, the Allan Houston $160 million lucky bounce at the old Miami Arena, Larry Johnson’s four-point play against the Pacers about 6 feet in front of my face, overtime in Kings-Lakers at Arco in ’02, Paul Pierce versus LeBron James last spring, LBJ at The Palace two years ago.
With so many great ones, I don’t think one can be judged as the best.
(continue reading…)